What is the difference between an interim control and abatement?

The distinction between interim controls and abatement is crucial in understanding lead hazard management. Interim controls refer specifically to methods used to temporarily reduce lead hazards, making a dwelling lead-safe for a limited period. These methods may include measures such as sealing or encapsulating lead paint, managing dust, or implementing regular cleaning protocols. However, these solutions are not permanent; they require ongoing management and may need to be revisited after some time, especially if conditions change or if interventions wear down.

In contrast, abatement refers to more permanent strategies aimed at the complete removal of lead hazards from a property. This could involve measures such as the removal of lead-based paint, replacement of building materials, or even extensive renovation work designed to eliminate lead risks entirely.

Understanding this difference is essential for those involved in lead safety management because it helps to determine the appropriate strategies for hazard reduction based on the specific needs and conditions of a property.