Where is removal most often used as an abatement technique?

Removal as an abatement technique is most often used in limited areas where preservation applies because it involves the complete elimination of lead-based paint or materials containing lead. This approach is typically undertaken in situations where preservation of the structure’s integrity is paramount, such as in historical buildings where specific areas may be at risk of lead exposure, but the building is otherwise suitable for preservation efforts.

In these instances, targeted removal ensures safety while maintaining the character and structure of the building. This technique is not generally practiced in all areas of a building because it can be impractical, costly, and potentially detrimental to the building's overall integrity and historical value. Additionally, removal is not applied indiscriminately in all homes with lead paint, as sometimes encapsulation or other less invasive methods could be more appropriate based on the condition of the paint and the presence of children or pregnant women. Finally, in areas with significant public access, while the risk of exposure is a concern, a comprehensive approach such as encapsulation or maintenance to prevent deterioration is often preferred over removal due to practical and financial considerations.